12 Angry Men 1957

An 18-year-old boy who grew up in a slum was brought to court on suspicion of killing his father. The witnesses were conclusive and all the evidence was extremely unfavorable to him. Twelve people from different professions formed the jury in this case. They had to reach a unanimous opinion in the lounge and decide whether the juvenile was guilty. If found guilty, the juvenile would be sentenced to death. The twelve jury members were all different. Except for Juror No. 8 (Henry Fonda), everyone else dismissed this case with such clear criminal facts and found the teenager guilty before the discussion began. Juror No. 8 raised his "reasonable doubts" and patiently convinced the other jurors. In the process, each of their different outlooks on life were also conflicting and competing...